The 2026 Golden Globes left many scratching their heads, with some of the biggest snubs and surprises in recent memory. Who could’ve predicted that Frankenstein would walk away empty-handed, despite its five nominations and industry buzz? Meanwhile, Hamnet pulled off an unexpected victory in the best motion picture drama category, leaving even director Chloé Zhao visibly stunned. But here’s where it gets controversial: Sentimental Value, with eight nominations—second only to One Battle After Another—managed to snag just one award, for Stellan Skarsgard’s supporting role. Was this a fair outcome, or did the international voters miss the mark? And this is the part most people miss: Skarsgard’s win was an upset, beating out Jacob Elordi, who had bested him at the Critics Choice Awards just days earlier.
Speaking of One Battle After Another, while it led with four wins, its momentum didn’t translate to its cast—until Teyana Taylor broke the streak with her best supporting actress win. But let’s not forget Frankenstein and Wicked: For Good, both shut out despite multiple nominations. Was this a sign of shifting tastes, or did these films simply fail to resonate with voters?
On the TV front, The White Lotus, Only Murders in the Building, and Severance—all heavy favorites—left the ceremony with nothing. Instead, Rhea Seehorn’s win for Pluribus stole the spotlight, proving that sometimes the underdog takes the crown.
Now, here’s a thought-provoking question: Did the Golden Globes get it right this year, or did they overlook some of the most deserving contenders? Share your thoughts in the comments—we’d love to hear your take on this year’s surprises and snubs!
