The Texans' running back room is about to undergo a significant transformation, and it's a move that has sparked some intriguing discussions among fans and analysts alike.
The arrival of David Montgomery signals a new era for Houston's backfield, but it also means the end of an era for two veteran running backs.
The Texans have long favored experienced runners, and their recent acquisitions of Joe Mixon and Nick Chubb seemed to solidify this strategy. However, with the trade for Montgomery, a player approaching his 30s, the team has effectively shut the door on their previous stable of seasoned tailbacks.
Houston acquired Mixon via trade in 2024, and Chubb joined as a free agent the following year. But with the official trade for Lions' running back Montgomery set for next week, it's clear that neither Mixon nor Chubb will be returning to the Texans in 2026.
Chubb managed to rush for 506 yards in 15 games (starting 9) during his time with the Texans in 2025. Meanwhile, Mixon spent the entire season on the non-football injury list, with his foot injury remaining a significant mystery throughout the year.
Both Chubb and Mixon are now free agents, and with the Texans' depth chart already filled at the running back position, it's highly unlikely they'll be back in Houston.
Montgomery and Woody Marks are expected to lead the way, and with the third-string running back typically playing a significant role on special teams, it's a position that older players rarely occupy.
Chubb is already 30, and Mixon will turn 30 in July. Their only chance of returning to Houston would involve neither signing with another team and an injury creating an opportunity for a reunion.
The Texans will pay Montgomery $6 million this year, with a further $9 million due in 2027. He'll be the older option for at least one, if not two years, while Marks, who impressed with 703 rushing yards as a rookie, continues to develop.
The decision to trade for Montgomery so soon after the Scouting Combine suggests the Texans explored their free-agent options and opted for a reliable, proven commodity at a relatively lower cost compared to the top free-agent running backs.
However, this move did come at a cost, with the Texans giving up multiple assets, including a fourth-round pick, to secure Montgomery's services. But this is a team that's not afraid to take calculated risks, especially when it comes to their running back strategy.
And here's where it gets controversial: Is this an effective strategy? With an aging running back and a younger, developing player, along with a significant annual overhaul of the offensive line, is this the best approach for the Texans?
What do you think? Do you agree with the Texans' approach, or do you think they should have explored other options? Let us know in the comments; we'd love to hear your thoughts on this intriguing roster move!
